Workshop with Mick Healy

Workshop with Mick Healy (HE Consultant and Researcher), 15 August, VU Melbourne

Topic: Developing partnerships between students, staff and employers through the curriculum

I really enjoyed this workshop, especially the links I was starting to make to my research about collaborative practices.  Mick was a really informative presenter, and the practical activities really enabled us to connect with people outside of our discipline areas…share stories with sessionals from other disciplines at VU!

Used with permission from Mick Healy, this figure summarises his ideas about engagement through partnership.

14568923_1182542715138983_1570420539_n

14551010_1182545948471993_1310750318_o

Some things I found interesting or want to think more about:

  • It’s important to involve students in research- the scholarship of teaching and learning not just to be researched as a participant.
  • Students are change agents, they are partners in decision making which is more than just having a student voice.
  • In partnership everyone has value and ideas and expertise- students know what it is to be a student!
  • Students should be involved in research and planning.
  • Explicit linking of teaching and research into curriculum.

 

  • MY FAVOURITE>> Research and Inquiry is not just for those who choose to pursue an academic career, it’s about developing different types of skills to be a professional.

I wonder about how this connects with our students and their contribution to creating curriculum at university?  I think their input into blended learning is valuable.  I have experienced studying blended learning samples at uni myself- some are well done, others are not quite getting the different ways we can learn and make time for learning now through technology.

It would be interesting to have a year long pedagogy subject, where Semester 2 was a collaboration of curriculum design with students, assessment is competency based and not reliant on essays!  Something to think about.


Publications by Mick Healy to check

Seminar with Dr Christine Winter, VU Melbourne

Visiting Scholar Seminar Dr Christine Winter 18 April, from the University of Sheffield, UK.

Venue: Victoria University, FTS PK Campus

Topic: National Curriculum Policy Reform in England and Australia: Implications for Students, Teachers and Social Justice?

christine-winter-seminar-1

I really enjoyed Christine Winter’s seminar, it was my first foot back into academia after 15 years, and I wanted to start getting my headpsace back into academic education and inform my thinking for my upcoming PhD coursework.  After the seminar, my head starting buzzing with new ideas and those feelings of ‘I’m an agent of change’ starting flooding back.  I’m really glad I’ve decided to come back to study at this time; I’m ready for it and focused.

Interesting sections to think about

christine-winter-seminar-2 christine-winter-seminar-3 christine-winter-seminar-4 christine-winter-seminar-5

As I’m starting to think around my research question at this time and how school curriculum policy and reform affect Higher education- particularly as a comparative UK and Australia study (I know, I know, I’m going big, but it’s just how I think, it’ll be refined in due course), I made note of the following points or questions which pertained to me and my research:

  • Content overload and question the political influences of priorities
  • Look at the ACARA site, highlighting Federal approaches to standardised curriculum, State based teacher CPD and assessment
  • Standardised prescribed content with state based vernacularisation- is there a difference?
  • What are the links between NAPLAN, School Priorities and Higher education values?
  • Interesting perception that students are seen as data in the UK- learning is assessment and performance driven, and not inclusive of the passion for study or personal interests regardless of scores.
  • What are the assumptions we make of whose knowledge is of most worth?
  • What are the structural inequalities of education? Derrida and Levinas (see references below)

Main questions I’m thinking about after attending this seminar which will help open my research topic:

  • How do student teachers have the skills to be flexible and develop creative thinking- what are we teaching them at uni or modelling to them to be flexible and cope with change?
  • How do universities hear the needs of preservice teachers?  Apart form feedback surveys.
  • What are the assumptions we make of whose knowledge is of most worth?
  • It seems the questions are still focused around schools/teacher/policy. I want to know how engagement of curriculum policy links to critical education research, and how does it affect university curriculum?

References to note:
Derrida, Jacques (1992). Force of Law: The ‘Mystical Foundation of Authority’. In ed. Drucilla Cornell, Michael Rosenfield and David G. Carlson. In Drucilla Cornell, Michel Rosenfeld & David Carlson (eds.).

Lévinas, Emmanuel. Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Duquesne University Press, 1969.

Lingard, Bob and McGregor, Glenda (2014) Two contrasting Australian Curriculum responses to globalisation: What students should learn or become. Curriculum Journal, 25 1: 90110. doi:10.1080/09585176.2013.872048